<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chief Electricity Officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/chief-electricity-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/chief-electricity-officer/</link>
	<description>on emerging platforms and the power of aggregation and integration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:28:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joern</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/chief-electricity-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Joern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=240#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I also think so. Maybe this: I dont know two or more companies working exactly the same way, but they are all using the same electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think so. Maybe this: I dont know two or more companies working exactly the same way, but they are all using the same electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Murdock</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/chief-electricity-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Murdock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=240#comment-315</guid>
		<description>If you want to simplify electricity to just &quot;on&quot; and &quot;off&quot;, you should do the same to IT---after all, it&#039;s just a bunch of 1s and 0s. Right? Personally, as someone who&#039;s blown up a few things trying to figure out how electricity (and IT) works, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a particularly good simplification. -ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to simplify electricity to just &#8220;on&#8221; and &#8220;off&#8221;, you should do the same to IT&#8212;after all, it&#8217;s just a bunch of 1s and 0s. Right? Personally, as someone who&#8217;s blown up a few things trying to figure out how electricity (and IT) works, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a particularly good simplification. -ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joern</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/chief-electricity-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Joern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=240#comment-314</guid>
		<description>What a tremendous false estimation. Power has only on and off while IT has billions of switches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a tremendous false estimation. Power has only on and off while IT has billions of switches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

