<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! My Web and the continued evolution of the Internet operating system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/yahoo-my-web-and-the-continued-evolution-of-the-internet-operating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/yahoo-my-web-and-the-continued-evolution-of-the-internet-operating-system/</link>
	<description>on emerging platforms and the power of aggregation and integration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:28:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deidre Nair</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/yahoo-my-web-and-the-continued-evolution-of-the-internet-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Deidre Nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/wp/?p=182#comment-224</guid>
		<description>lo Ian, It may be all about Integration, but with yahoo,its a at best a hodge podge. I&#039;m a yahoo user for 6 years, now my ISP is also yahoo branded (BTYahoo!). Their toolbar is the worst of the lot .Saved searches was first introduced by a9.com. In fact a9.com search is extensible, I can search images, wikipedia, flights, msdn etc from a9, just 1click (i dont work for amazon, just like their toolbar :P). Yahoo toolbar is a couple of buttons with links to other parts of their site like bookmarks, myweb etc. Point: Integration with other features is good, as long as it isnt at the expense of usability. right now, i would&#039;nt count Yahoo as a gaint with a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lo Ian, It may be all about Integration, but with yahoo,its a at best a hodge podge. I&#8217;m a yahoo user for 6 years, now my ISP is also yahoo branded (BTYahoo!). Their toolbar is the worst of the lot .Saved searches was first introduced by a9.com. In fact a9.com search is extensible, I can search images, wikipedia, flights, msdn etc from a9, just 1click (i dont work for amazon, just like their toolbar :P). Yahoo toolbar is a couple of buttons with links to other parts of their site like bookmarks, myweb etc. Point: Integration with other features is good, as long as it isnt at the expense of usability. right now, i would&#8217;nt count Yahoo as a gaint with a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Murdock</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/yahoo-my-web-and-the-continued-evolution-of-the-internet-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Murdock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/wp/?p=182#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Hi Deidre,

Thanks for sharing that. I&#039;ve been meaning to take a look at A9, and I will. A9&#039;s CEO, Udi Manber, was a former colleague of mine from University of Arizona days, before (ironically enough) he was hired away by Yahoo to be their Chief Scientist. He&#039;s a very bright guy, one of the pioneers of search and the web. One advantage Yahoo has over A9 is Yahoo has email, contacts, calendars, and a bunch of other stuff ready integrated. Then again, in an Internet operating system composed of distributed services interconnected by a set of open APIs, I guess that doesn&#039;t really matter much in the long run (and is probably better, since too much centralization could lead us right back into a monopoly situation).

-ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Deidre,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing that. I&#8217;ve been meaning to take a look at A9, and I will. A9&#8242;s CEO, Udi Manber, was a former colleague of mine from University of Arizona days, before (ironically enough) he was hired away by Yahoo to be their Chief Scientist. He&#8217;s a very bright guy, one of the pioneers of search and the web. One advantage Yahoo has over A9 is Yahoo has email, contacts, calendars, and a bunch of other stuff ready integrated. Then again, in an Internet operating system composed of distributed services interconnected by a set of open APIs, I guess that doesn&#8217;t really matter much in the long run (and is probably better, since too much centralization could lead us right back into a monopoly situation).</p>
<p>-ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cori Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/yahoo-my-web-and-the-continued-evolution-of-the-internet-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Cori Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/wp/?p=182#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to say that the most exciting thing about the Yahoo MyWeb offering is the attention.xml starting point.  

While the Firefox toolbar is nice, the third-party Googlebar for Firefox works just as well, and Yahoo isn&#039;t the best place to save information about site&#039;s you&#039;ve visited (again, Firefox extensions make del-icio-us and Furl the best places for that, IMHO).  But the fact that they publish what you&#039;ve saved in attention format is super-cool, even while it&#039;s very basic.  Love to see some traction on the attention.xml front.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say that the most exciting thing about the Yahoo MyWeb offering is the attention.xml starting point.  </p>
<p>While the Firefox toolbar is nice, the third-party Googlebar for Firefox works just as well, and Yahoo isn&#8217;t the best place to save information about site&#8217;s you&#8217;ve visited (again, Firefox extensions make del-icio-us and Furl the best places for that, IMHO).  But the fact that they publish what you&#8217;ve saved in attention format is super-cool, even while it&#8217;s very basic.  Love to see some traction on the attention.xml front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

