<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;It goes to 11&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/</link>
	<description>on emerging platforms and the power of aggregation and integration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:28:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Bielicki</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Bielicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>Yes you can do that easily. We run high traffic glassfish and apache on it and it runs perfectly fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you can do that easily. We run high traffic glassfish and apache on it and it runs perfectly fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmin</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>webmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>can we use Open Solaris in a production environment?
it will run php-mysql-apache, would be nice to know if it&#039;s stable enough to run a high traffic web server, (dont know why, but Solaris 10 looks too huge &amp; scary for me)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we use Open Solaris in a production environment?<br />
it will run php-mysql-apache, would be nice to know if it&#8217;s stable enough to run a high traffic web server, (dont know why, but Solaris 10 looks too huge &amp; scary for me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux-OS &#187; El nuevo Solaris se basará en OpenSolaris 2009.06</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux-OS &#187; El nuevo Solaris se basará en OpenSolaris 2009.06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>[...] día tenía que suceder, y ahora ya es oficial: la recientemente lanzada versión 2009.06 de OpenSolaris será la base sobre la que se construirá [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] día tenía que suceder, y ahora ya es oficial: la recientemente lanzada versión 2009.06 de OpenSolaris será la base sobre la que se construirá [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenSolaris&#8217; ARM port &#171; YC&#8217;s playground</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenSolaris&#8217; ARM port &#171; YC&#8217;s playground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>[...] worth mentioning that Ian Murdock said this will form the basis for &#8220;Solaris [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worth mentioning that Ian Murdock said this will form the basis for &#8220;Solaris [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>Your humility astonishes me. 

Thanks for Debian and OpenSolaris both :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your humility astonishes me. </p>
<p>Thanks for Debian and OpenSolaris both :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Smart</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong Ian, but I think Brigadier comes after Colonel? :-)

Perhaps it&#039;s just the wider open source community which gives you &quot;a lot more credit&quot; than you deserve? I don&#039;t know how much work you actually did internally because I&#039;m not an employee of Sun&#039;s, but I know that since you went on board that OpenSolaris has become a truly powerful and impressive operating system, in terms of competition with GNU/Linux and BSD.

From the outside looking in, you were the one who pulled Project Indiana together to create what we now know as OpenSolaris. Rightly or wrongly, well done and thanks!

(And thanks for Debian too!)

-c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong Ian, but I think Brigadier comes after Colonel? :-)</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just the wider open source community which gives you &#8220;a lot more credit&#8221; than you deserve? I don&#8217;t know how much work you actually did internally because I&#8217;m not an employee of Sun&#8217;s, but I know that since you went on board that OpenSolaris has become a truly powerful and impressive operating system, in terms of competition with GNU/Linux and BSD.</p>
<p>From the outside looking in, you were the one who pulled Project Indiana together to create what we now know as OpenSolaris. Rightly or wrongly, well done and thanks!</p>
<p>(And thanks for Debian too!)</p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Murdock</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Murdock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>Ouch. Seems someone is a bit pissed off at the world that they haven&#039;t yet reached the rank of General.. -ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. Seems someone is a bit pissed off at the world that they haven&#8217;t yet reached the rank of General.. -ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel Abraham</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>&quot;While Project Indiana was indeed a catalyst for big change in Solaris, I get a lot more credit for the resulting change than is deserved,&quot;

From whom?  I&#039;ve yet to hear anyone say anything good about your involvement with the project, apart from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While Project Indiana was indeed a catalyst for big change in Solaris, I get a lot more credit for the resulting change than is deserved,&#8221;</p>
<p>From whom?  I&#8217;ve yet to hear anyone say anything good about your involvement with the project, apart from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Gueck</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Gueck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>Modern Solaris administration features have gone a long way in a few years, and the organisations I&#039;ve talked about in Sun blogs are, as far as I understand, tentatively giving it another try. The Sun tech efforts made Solaris good, and the Oracle merger is making it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Solaris administration features have gone a long way in a few years, and the organisations I&#8217;ve talked about in Sun blogs are, as far as I understand, tentatively giving it another try. The Sun tech efforts made Solaris good, and the Oracle merger is making it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmerjohn</title>
		<link>http://ianmurdock.com/solaris/it-goes-to-11/comment-page-1/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>farmerjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianmurdock.com/?p=916#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>&#039;For a variety of reasons, it probably won’t be called “11″.&#039;

Open Unbreakable Enterprise Cluster Grid Solaris 11h?

Sorry, someone had to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;For a variety of reasons, it probably won’t be called “11″.&#8217;</p>
<p>Open Unbreakable Enterprise Cluster Grid Solaris 11h?</p>
<p>Sorry, someone had to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

